William Chittick's Translation of Kašf al-Asrār wa ʿOddat al-Abrār:

Perpetuating Orientalist Paradigms

Authors

  • Marzieh Malekshahi 📧 Assistant Professor, English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran
  • Dr Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran

Abstract

This article provides a postcolonial analysis of William Chittick's English translation of Kašf al-asrār wa ʿoddat al-abrār, a monumental Qurʾānic commentary by the 12th-century Persian scholar Abu’l-Fażl Rašid-al-Din Meybodi. The study investigates how Chittick's positionality as a contemporary Western academic shaped his translation approach, arguing that it reflects certain Orientalist leanings inherited from colonialist discourses. The analysis focuses on framing devices, selectivity, and translation choices that exoticize Islamic culture as mystical and inferior. Strategies like framing Meybodi’s text specifically as "Sufi" commentary, excluding biographical content, and selectively emphasizing passages related to "love" cater to Orientalist paradigms that bifurcate between an emotional, mystical Sufism and legalistic, orthodox Islam. This reductionist filtering tailored for Western expectations fragments Meybodi's integrated exegetical methodology which interweaves linguistic, legal, and spiritual dimensions. Chittick's omission of extensive Arabic sections and hadiths diminishes the centrality of Prophetic narrations in Qurʾānic interpretation. Overall, the study argues that Chittick's decontextualization and homogenization of this profoundly diverse text severely compromises its integrity. It calls for greater reflexivity regarding translators' inherited ideological assumptions and respect for the cultural context and polyvalent nature of source texts.

Keywords:

Kašf al-asrār, Orientalism, Postcolonialism, Qurʾānic exegesis, Sufism, Translation

References

Aschcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2004). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Postcolonial Literatures. London & New York: Routledge.

Basnett, S, & Trividi, H. (1999). Of Colonies, Cannibals and Vernaculars. In S. Bassnett & H. Trividi (Eds.), Post-colonial Translation: Theory and Practice (pp.1–18). London: Routledge.

Bassnett, S. (2010). Postcolonial Translations. In Sh. Chew & D. Richards (Eds), A Concise Companion to Postcolonial Literature (pp. 78–96). Wiley-Blackwell.

Carbonell, O. (1996). The Exotic Space of Cultural Translation. In R. Alvarez (Ed), Translation, Power and Subversion (pp. 69–98). Multilingual Matters.

Chan, L.T.H (2000). Colonization, Resistance and the Uses of Postcolonial Translation Theory in Twentieth-century China. In Sh. Simon & P. St-Pierre (Eds), Changing the Terms: Translating in the Postcolonial Era (pp. 53–70). Canada: University of Ottawa Press.

Chittick, W. C. (2015). Introduction. In R.A.D. Meybodi, The unveiling of the mysteries and the provision of the pious: Kashf al-asrār wa ʿuddat al-abrār (pp. 1–9). (W.C. Chittick, Trans.). Amman, Jordan: Fons Vitae.

Dissanayake, W (2006). Post-colonial Theory and Asian Communication Theory: Toward a Creative Dialogue. China Media Research. 2(4).

Keeler, A. (2009). Meybodi, Abu'l-Fazl Rashid-al-Din. Encyclopedia Iranica. Retrieved November 17, 2023, from https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/meybodi-abul-fazl-rasid-al-din

Meybodi, R. A. D. (2015). The unveiling of the mysteries and the provision of the pious: Kashf al-asrār wa ʿuddat al-abrār (W. C. Chittick, Trans.). Amman, Jordan: Fons Vitae.

Meybodi, R. A. D. (1952–1960). Kašf al-asrār wa ʿoddat al-abrār (Vols. 1–10). (ʿA.-A. Ḥekmat, Ed.). Tehran.

Moore, D.C. (2001). Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? PLAMA, 116(1), 111–126. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/463645

Munday, J. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Application. London: Rutledge.

Nicholson, R. A. (1914). The mystics of Islam (Vol. 5). G. Bell and sons, Limited.

Niranjana, T. (1992). Siting Translation: History, Post-colonialism, and the Colonial Context. Berkley, Los Angeles and Oxford: University of California Press.

Richard, J. (1992). Translation and Cultural Hegemony: the Case of the French-Arabic Translation. In L. Venuti (Ed.), Rethinking Translation: Discourse/ Subjectivity and Ideology (pp. 139–159). London: Rutledge.

Said, E.W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

Schwarz, H. (2005). Mission Impossible: Introducing Postcolonial Studies in the US Academy. In H. Schwarz & S. Ray (Eds), A Companion to Postcolonial Studies (pp. 1–20). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Sengupta, M (1990). Translation, Colonialism and Poetics: Rabindranath Tagore in Two Worlds. In S. Bassnett & A. Lefevere (Eds.), Translation, History and Culture. London: Pinter Publisher.

Shamma, T. (2009). Postcolonial Studies and Translation Theory. MonTI. 1, 183–196. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=265119728014

Simon, Sh. (1997). Translation, Post-colonialism, and Cultural Studies. Meta. XIII (2), 462–477.

Snell-Hornby, M. (2006). The Turns of Translation Studies: New paradigms or shifting viewpoints?. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Tymoczko, M. (1999). Translation in a Post-colonial Context: Early Irish Literature in English Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

Tymoczko, M. (2010). Translation, Resistance, Activism: An Overview. In M. Tymoczko (Ed.), Translation, Resistance, Activism (pp. 1–22). University of Massachusetts Press.

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. New York & London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Venuti, L. (2017). The translator's invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge.

Young, R. J. C. (2003). Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Yousef, T (2004). Translation and the Cultural Dimension: A Postcolonial –Poststructuralist Approach. Damascus University Journal, 2 (3+4), 43–56.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-26

How to Cite

Malekshahi, M., & Mirseyyed, S. M. R. (2024). William Chittick’s Translation of Kašf al-Asrār wa ʿOddat al-Abrār:: Perpetuating Orientalist Paradigms. Iranian Journal of Translation Studies, 21(84). Retrieved from https://journal.translationstudies.ir/ts/article/view/1154

Issue

Section

Academic Research Paper

DOR